Technology Readiness
Is the core claim supported by reproducible evidence within a defined operating window?
- Replicated results
- Process window
- Failure envelope
- Measurement integrity
Methodology
A single structure applied to every engagement: eight readiness dimensions, each assessed against stage-appropriate conditions and supporting evidence.
Eight dimensions
Is the core claim supported by reproducible evidence within a defined operating window?
Does a credible physical path exist from current scale to target scale?
Does the operating system produce decisions at the pace the roadmap requires?
Are the right capabilities present, sequenced and retained?
Are hazards, permits and certifications on the plan, not after it?
Do plans reflect real lead times, dependencies and failure recovery?
Is the raise sized and timed to de-risking events rather than runway?
Is there a validated buyer, specification and route to first industrial revenue?
Stage calibration
Pre-Seed
Testability
The claim is defined, falsifiable and within reach of the current team and equipment. Readiness is assessed on evidence design, not on results.
Seed
Reproducibility
Results replicate outside a single operator and a single run. The R&D operating system begins to exist as a system rather than as effort.
Series A
Scalability
The scale-up path is engineered, the safety and permitting timeline is real, and the organization can absorb capital without losing velocity.
Beyond
Industrialisation
Qualification, supply chain, throughput and commercial delivery become the binding constraints, and readiness is measured in operating performance.
Structured qualification before any conversation. Each submission is reviewed against decision risk, stage and sector fit.